Yako Casino: Warning about this casino!!! (Page 4)

DanielGambler wrote on 18.01.2020 at 18:51
There are hardly any good pure MGA casinos left. They all have a UK and/or SWE license by now as well. But Genesis and Bethard, among others, have already banned players who call themselves gambling addicts from the entire group when they only had an MGA license (and not yet a UK one)

This post has been translated automatically

MarcT22186 wrote on 18.01.2020 at 19:08
Because of the current UKGC conformity of some holdings and even platforms, there is the possibility to be blocked company-wide if desired.

This post has been translated automatically

DanielGambler wrote on 01/18/2020 at 19:39
That is so not true. The serious providers with MGA license have already offered these possibilities before, only the unserious MGA licensees of L&L, Aspire Global and Everymatrix have allowed this. For example, Bethard, 888, Genesis Casinos, as I said before the UK license was already different

That the licensees do not have to do it from the MGA I have never doubted. I would still avoid those who do not do it because that always allows conclusions about other things that do these casinos. The MGA is what concerns just very lobby controlled and that state authorities in Malta are susceptible to corruption has also shown the murder case in which L&L is involved

Nevertheless, Malta must adhere to EU law which makes the license in comparison to Curaçao significantly better. The Curaçao casinos often do not pay out and do not even have to allow players to set limits. The MGA casinos do. In the MGA casinos, the games must also be on external servers of the Provider, Curaçao casinos can also operate on their own servers, so Manipulation is of course in the Curaçao casinos door and gate open. In addition, the backers at Curaçao casinos are almost never known which also leads to the fact that these casinos often do not even pay out wins. In MGA casinos you get your money at least as long as you adhere to the terms and conditions.

In short, you can say Curaçao casinos are basically not regulated and supervised. The MGA are just subject to EU law which makes them definitely much better, but you can not trust MGA casinos blindly and should keep your eyes open as a player. As L&L, Aspire Global and Everymatrix show. I personally recommend to avoid casinos of these operators just as Curaçao casinos.

This post has been translated automatically

MarcT22186 wrote on 18.01.2020 at 19:56
Well, Curaçao must also comply with EU laws in the economic framework after all they are part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and are EU OCT member.

Source Wikipedia

To the area of the Netherlands, which is represented in this article, belong beside the twelve provinces of the European part the Caribbean islands Bonaire , Sint Eustatius xml-ph-0750@d Other Dutch Caribbean territories are not part of the country Netherlands, but are autonomous countries in the Kingdom of the Netherlands . These are the countries Aruba , Curaçao and Sint Maarten .

This post has been translated automatically

DanielGambler wrote on 18.01.2020 at 16:24
I find it unserious not to block a player for all casinos with the same license if you know that he is addicted to gambling and has already been blocked in another casino with the license. What exactly is there not to understand?


In addition, it seems to me that you are either an Affiliate for these casinos or even one here from GambleJoe who has simply created a secondary account. Is here since the start of the platform apparently unfortunately common to manipulate the readers. Also works with most. Funny that there are within a short time 2 thumbs up for the contribution. Bit too obvious everything

Who wants to play in the casinos should do it and who wants to do business with such people also. It's up to everyone.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

DanielGambler wrote on 19.01.2020 at 17:53: Where did I write that a single factor is sufficient

We all agree that it is serious to ban players license-wide and unserious not to do it, right?
That doesn't mean that a licensee who doesn't do it is generally bad. However, it is one indication of many

As far as the reduced RTP is concerned, this is unfortunately the last straw. However, one must also note that this is no different in German casinos. They can change the RTP from one second to the other on the machines. Every player must get into the habit of looking at the RTP before each game. After all, with most online slots you have this option, offline you do not. I personally find the secretly and quietly reduce the RTP to puke and do not play slots with reduced RTP. Therefore, casinos that reduce the RTP but not immediately unseriös. The reduced RTPs are mainly the consequence of regulation in the UK. Which also shows that the regulation there for EU players brings no advantages but rather disadvantages

Videoslots, for example, has reduced the RTPs for the entire market twice in a very short time. Therefore, Videoslots is not immediately unserious but I have decided for me because of this no longer play there. It can not be that players from Germany are asked to pay for increased costs in the UK market. As for other casinos, I always look at the RTP and if it is below a certain threshold I leave the game immediately.

But back to the actual topic L&L = unseriös! This has always been the case for me and will remain so. There is also the not license-wide lock even the smallest evil in this juice store. This also shows the massive involvement of the co-owner in the case Daphne Caruana Galizia. I despise such a thing to the depths! But again, even without that, L&L would be just bad compared to other market players. By the way, here at GambleJoe you see it similarly that the L&L casinos are bad, they were all widely rated bad. However, for me personally they are so bad that you should not even offer a platform.

P.S. By the way, my experience with Rizk speaks MT Secure others. Because I myself was blocked for all casinos under their license. Also for the whitelabels not operated by GIG itself.

This post has been translated automatically