Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

# Other Casinos #: Refund because of player protection? Fraud? (Page 2)

Topic created on 12th Aug. 2021 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 11 | Views: 3,152
Niroht
Experienced

Refund because of player protection? Fraud?

13th Aug. 2021, at 11:26 am CEST#11
1 Like

Liked this post: Avatar von Mojojojo Mojojojo
Antihero1335 wrote on 08/12/2021 at 23:54
Meal,
so you tell us here that you had the spontaneous intuition from somewhere that gg and Vulkan Vegas might have something to do with each other, during your "intensive research" it turns out to be a fact. Of course, you noticed that only when the money was gone...

Colleague, the story is probably only for stupid people; no one plays at Vulkan by chance, then gets banned there and continues to play at an even more bizarre casino. I claim that the recovery of losses via the constructed track was planned from the beginning.

You can think what you want about reclaiming losses, but this is nothing more than fraud against the provider.

And no, it is not unjust enrichment (by the way, that is what it is called)

Finally, suing a company registered in Cyprus? Forget about is.

I think we should leave the matter in the village.
Except of not provable insinuations and a Oberlehrerhafte kind concerning grammatical errors opposite the Treadersteller I find your contribution not only completely beside the point and unnecessary.

I find the claiming of losses also absolutely not right and would not consider it due to my value canon for myself at this time.

BUT, I am also of the opinion that one presupposed the legal conformity must respect the behavior and action, other people, even if it may displease one personally

If someone acts intentionally and then inflicts damage on others (casino, their employees and ultimately also us players) via legal action and thus shifts his own responsibility, I find it disgusting and antisocial

But in the case of the thread creator, if his explanations are correct, that he could still Deposit and play due to his self-blocking, a casino is proportionately also in the responsibility
The prerequisite is, of course, the truthfulness of the registration data, for example, which must correspond to the data provided at the time of the blocking and the indication of Gambling addiction
Honestly, closing an account due to dissatisfaction is not necessarily unusual, but no one locks themselves due to gambling addiction
At least I believe that it must be taken seriously and treated as such

This post has been translated automatically

Mojojojo

Refund because of player protection? Fraud?

13th Aug. 2021, at 11:48 am CEST#12
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Thorin2017 wrote on 13.08.2021 at 11:26 am
I think one should leave the church in the village.
Except of not provable insinuations and a Oberlehrerhafte kind regarding grammatical errors to the Treadersteller I find your contribution not only completely off and unnecessary.

I also find the claiming of losses absolutely not right and would not consider it due to my value canon for myself at this time.

BUT, I am also of the opinion that one presupposed the legal conformity must respect the behavior and action, other people, even if it may displease one personally

If someone acts intentionally and then inflicts damage on others (casino, their employees and ultimately also us players) via legal action and thus shifts his own responsibility, I find it disgusting and antisocial

But in the case of the thread creator, if his explanations are correct, that he could still Deposit and play due to his self-blocking, a casino is proportionally also in the responsibility
The prerequisite is, of course, the truthfulness of the registration data, for example, which must match the data provided at the time of the blocking and the indication of Gambling addiction
Honestly, closing an account due to dissatisfaction is not necessarily unusual, but no one locks themselves due to gambling addiction
At least I believe that it must be taken seriously and treated as such

Thanks for the message.

My allegations against the casino are to be refuted.

Since I have only one mail address, these are identical with the registration and the block.

On gg.bet it was sufficient to enter the mail address and set a password.
Screenshots about my account I made ahead of time, because it made you very suspicious. In my madness, I had thought nothing of it. In the meantime it is locked. Screenshots to the transactions I had also made before.

As also mentioned, I had only searched for the address after the fact and came across Vulkan Vegas, which has the same office address and both sites are run by the same group.
In the Live Chat of gg.bet this was explicitly denied. I have sent the history by mail.

In principle it is not only about the repayment but it is meanwhile really fraud.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics19th Jan. 2025 at 07:25 am CET

Online Casinos
0
World
0
Online Casinos
0

GambleJoe Team

Profile picture of JulianJulian
Community-Manager / Complaint SpecialistProfile picture of CounterCounter
Software developerProfile picture of MatthiasMatthias
Project manager
Profile picture of DanielDaniel
Founder

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2025 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately