Insane92 wrote on 07.12.2023 at 14:23: -- message has been removed --
I wrote that I wanted to pay out directly but it didn't work because I was supposed to convert the 260€ additionally without authorization
Before you give yourself mental thin shit here, first read the texts properly 🤦🏻♂️
I don't think you understand what Falke wrote.
I would also ask you to calm down. Why do you have to be insulting? Did Falke insult you somewhere?
Boy boy... 92 vintage (I'm assuming) and can't communicate with people. Are you really 31 years old?
In any case: Falke thinks you could have converted the €260 that was credited to you THEN. You will certainly NOT have lost everything. You would have always needed dead spin for this or you simply played too high - in which case it's an unnecessary Risk that you took and felt the effects of.
I'm not suing for damages but it fits 😄 It's just a complaint about fraudulent behavior on the part of the casino I didn't say that I want my money back I'm not dependent on that Here are quite a few things that I didn't even write .... interesting
frapi07 wrote on 07.12.2023 at 14:15:
If you're unlucky, you can lose half of your wager. Of course, it depends on how quickly you do it and how lucky you are.
I suspect that the TE took a chance and kept gambling to get to his original amount. But whether that was €50 or €100 doesn't make much difference.
But yes, this brings us back to the issue of people who first try their luck in the gambling sector and when this fails, they sue the casinos for damages.
Insane92 wrote on 07.12.2023 at 14:28: I'm not suing for damages but it fits 😄 It's just a complaint about fraudulent behavior on the part of the casino I didn't say that I want my money back I'm not dependent on it here there are quite a few things that I didn't even write .... interesting
My last sentence was a generalization and not specific to you.
A complaint only makes sense if it is justified.
I agree with you on one point: the 1x additional wagering is unnecessary. Yes, you're right about that.
Nevertheless, you could have had your money paid out after another wagering. But you didn't. That makes your complaint unnecessary, do you understand?
If you're unlucky, you can lose half of your wager. Of course, it depends on how quickly you do it and how lucky you are.
I suspect that the TE took a chance and kept gambling to get to his original amount. But whether that was €50 or €100 doesn't make much difference.
But yes, this brings us back to the issue of people who first try their luck in the gambling sector and when this fails, they sue the casinos for damages.
These are just two different things, but we've already discussed this many times, so I don't want to open the barrel unnecessarily.
Insane92 wrote on 07.12.2023 at 14:23: -- Part of the message has been removed --
I wrote that I wanted to pay out directly but it didn't work because I was supposed to convert the 260€ additionally without authorization
Before you give yourself mental thin shit here, first read the texts properly 🤦🏻♂️
If you can't read with comprehension, it's not my fault. Frapi has already said it all. Anyone who still expresses themselves like that at the age of 31 has either been left behind at secondary school or earns their living assembling ballpoint pens.
And this is also a no Deposit bonus that you can discuss here beschwert🤦♂️Macht to the thread here makes no sense. I understand the annoyance that you couldn't withdraw 260€ directly, but you still got a good alternative for it, then you just have 100-170€ paid out after the wagering, my God😪you can overdo it too
Fraudulent behavior
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't think you understand what Falke wrote.
I would also ask you to calm down. Why do you have to be insulting? Did Falke insult you somewhere?
Boy boy... 92 vintage (I'm assuming) and can't communicate with people. Are you really 31 years old?
In any case: Falke thinks you could have converted the €260 that was credited to you THEN. You will certainly NOT have lost everything. You would have always needed dead spin for this or you simply played too high - in which case it's an unnecessary Risk that you took and felt the effects of.
This post has been translated automatically
Fraudulent behavior
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Fraudulent behavior
Nobody has liked this post so far
My last sentence was a generalization and not specific to you.
A complaint only makes sense if it is justified.
I agree with you on one point: the 1x additional wagering is unnecessary. Yes, you're right about that.
Nevertheless, you could have had your money paid out after another wagering. But you didn't. That makes your complaint unnecessary, do you understand?
This post has been translated automatically
Fraudulent behavior
Nobody has liked this post so far
These are just two different things, but we've already discussed this many times, so I don't want to open the barrel unnecessarily.
If you can't read with comprehension, it's not my fault. Frapi has already said it all. Anyone who still expresses themselves like that at the age of 31 has either been left behind at secondary school or earns their living assembling ballpoint pens.
This post has been translated automatically
Fraudulent behavior
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically