At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

GambleJoe Cookies
Providers:	GJ International Limited
	Cookie name:	PHPSESSID
	Purpose:	This cookie is created by an application based on PHP. The purpose of this cookie is to recognise the user.
	Cookie lifetime:	24 months
	Cookie name:	sid
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to assign personal configuration data.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	gjcook[ver]
	Purpose:	Version of the saved privacy setting
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	gjcook[stat]
	Purpose:	Configuration of statistic cookies
	Cookie lifetime:	12 month
	Cookie name:	identifier
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to automatically log in when using the "Stay logged in" feature.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	securitytoken
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to automatically login when using the "stay signed in" feature.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months

Google Analytics
Providers:	Google Ireland Limited
Data protection decl.:	https://policies.google.com/privacy
	Cookie name:	_ga
	Purpose:	Collection of statistics on the website usage. (Measurement of the range)
	Cookie lifetime:	24 months
	Cookie name:	_gid
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to collect user statistics for the website.
	Cookie lifetime:	24 hours
	Cookie name:	_gat
	Purpose:	Used to throttle the request rate.
	Cookie lifetime:	0

Elite

Knochen

Forum posts: 2.394 Member since: 16.04.2018

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

28th Oct. 2020, at 10:34 pm CET#44

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

RebellYell wrote on 10/28/2020 at 10:13 pm
I am supposed to

- Salary statement (where address of employer is well read)
- Bank statements
- Selfie with ID and note in hand

Send. Because of 29 euros? Sometime is also good. They already have my current ID and current invoice. If we were talking about several hundred euros, I would certainly do that.

Because of the sum. No.. Money is written off and good.

Would you really submit/do it all because of such an amount from a gift bonus?

No, I wouldn't. But maybe I tick there also generally differently, because I would give such an amount probably not at all to the disbursement

I have at Online Casinos always so a certain basic concern about problems with withdrawals. So if I give a payout in order then I already adjust to it and then I would do that. However, I have been really lucky so far and have never been treated unfairly. Verification has so far always worked without problems even without service charge statements. In the meantime, I only play at Videoslots, Wildz and various No Account Casinos, where everything always goes smoothly anyway

This post has been translated automatically

Expert

Nickii45

Forum posts: 1.146 Member since: 23.04.2018

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

28th Oct. 2020, at 10:49 pm CET#45

2 Likes

Liked this post: CashOut, sippi

I'm glad I closed my account there ages ago 😃😃😃

This post has been translated automatically

Elite

mowolum

verified

Forum posts: 3.902 Member since: 14.12.2017

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

28th Oct. 2020, at 11:05 pm CET#46

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Bone wrote on 28.10.2020 at 22:03: Only times briefly thrown in and then directly slid out again from the thread: It would be absolutely against the law to deny an unemployed person on benefits the right to participate in gambling

Believe rather it goes with Lapalingo around what else. What some here somehow forget is that according to mga statutes casinos are obliged to verify the source of income of players to ensure that the money does not come from illegal activities

Of course, this is complete nonsense with a €29 payout and a no Deposit bonus, but Lapalingo is simply making use of applicable law here. So all the excitement will bring nothing. Either write off the payout or just send in proof of salary. Where I also really do not understand what is so bad about it. I mean we all hand over sensitive data to the casinos and somehow rely on the fact that they will be safe and that everything is correct, because we have no other choice. If it is now so that you can no longer gamble without proof of salary is but just another verification. I understand that you actually want to be in the right. But you can't win that fight either. So RebelYell, just send them a proof and that's it. Nothing can happen.

@Knochen, I must agree with you completely.

Considering to filter out the benefit recipients is presumptuous and also against the law.
The salary certificate is rather to avoid money laundering, or to stop.

This post has been translated automatically

Icon

Falko

Forum posts: 6.425 Member since: 08.07.2018

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

28th Oct. 2020, at 11:12 pm CET#47

2 Likes

Liked this post: CashOut, sippi

I find that simply exaggerated. On the day where there is Harz 4, the gaming arcades are fullest and against it is also not proceeded. If someone deposits larger sums, then that's fine, but Lapalingo seems to pull this through with everyone who requests a withdrawal. Somewhere the casino shoots itself just ne bullet in the leg. Anyone who reads this will now certainly no longer invest his money at Lapalingo

This post has been translated automatically

Expert

Saphira

Moderatorverified

Forum posts: 1.924 Member since: 24.01.2019

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

28th Oct. 2020, at 11:22 pm CET#48

2 Likes

Liked this post: CashOut, RiverSong

Whereby it would be complete nonsense to suspect money laundering at 29, - Euro. ^^

Perhaps it is however in such a way angedacht on the part of the state not to exclude the benefit recipients generally (since against the law) from the gambling, to make it for you however in the long run with the demand for a salary proof more heavily. This would also have a psychological component. One would constantly have the feeling that in the background exactly is registered, how high possible wins turn out or one feels due to the performed "oath of disclosure" rather forced to report perhaps high wins now nevertheless as legally prescribed. Something that might have been omitted before

I hope it's not like that, but it does make you wonder

Believe but in this case rather that Lapalingo has decided there arbitrarily to require proof of salary. Simply because they can. No matter how high the win is

This post has been translated automatically

Elite

Knochen

Forum posts: 2.394 Member since: 16.04.2018

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

29th Oct. 2020, at 12:05 am CET#49

2 Likes

Liked this post: RebellYell, T****s

Here someone once threw something about benefit recipients into the room and everyone immediately jumps up? I claim it has nothing at all to do with it. If someone receives Hartz IV, he could probably just send the notice and that would be fine

This post has been translated automatically

Top Member

RebellYell

verifiedTopic Creator

Forum posts: 778 Member since: 12.09.2019

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

29th Oct. 2020, at 12:33 am CET#50

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Saphira wrote on 28.10.2020 at 23:22: Whereas it would be complete nonsense to suspect money laundering at 29,- Euro. ^^

Perhaps it is however in such a way thought of on the part of the state not to exclude the benefit recipients generally (since against the law) from gambling, but to make it more difficult for you in the long run with the demand for a salary proof. This would also have a psychological component. One would constantly have the feeling that in the background exactly is registered, how high possible wins turn out or one feels due to the performed "oath of disclosure" rather forced to report perhaps high wins now nevertheless as legally prescribed. Something that might have been omitted before

I hope it's not like that, but it does make you wonder

Believe but in this case rather that Lapalingo has decided there arbitrarily to require proof of salary. Simply because they can. No matter how high the win is

If it should have been money laundering, I would have had to have deposited money. Otherwise I would have been money laundering for the casino, since I played with the Bonus money of the casino ^^

This post has been translated automatically

Top Member

RebellYell

verifiedTopic Creator

Forum posts: 778 Member since: 12.09.2019

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

29th Oct. 2020, at 12:35 am CET#51

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Bone wrote on 29.10.2020 at 00:05: Here once someone threw something about benefit recipients in the room and everyone immediately jumps up? I claim it has nothing at all to do with it. If someone receives Hartz IV, he could probably just send the notice and that would be fine.

That's exactly what I think. It has absolutely nothing to do with it

This post has been translated automatically

T****s

Forum posts: 388 Member has been banned

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

29th Oct. 2020, at 01:20 am CET#52

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

You can also just send it because, just imagine you win 10,000 euros then you have the Verification with proof of salary already behind you.

Somehow contradictory of yourself because, at 29 euros do not do it but at a higher sum probably...

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

verified

Former Member

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

29th Oct. 2020, at 03:25 am CET#53

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

lapalingo is again such a bad example. with me they already wanted various proofs when depositing because of nem bonus

This post has been translated automatically

Lapalingo: At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went...... (Page 5)

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......

Best Online Casinos

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 06:18 pm CET

Aristocrat receives first licence for slot machines in the ...

Impending ceiling collapse at historic Swiss ...

DGGS: The top-selling slots in October ...

GambleJoe Team

Community Forum-Moderators

Forgotten your password?