Lapalingo: At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went...... (Page 4)

This post has been translated automatically

Iseedeadpeople wrote on 28.10.2020 at 16:44: just thinking.
what if lapa want to filter out those who receive state aid (any kind of aid is meant)? because these will, no matter whether a few € or a few thousand € win probably not succeed in any oc with proof of salary. and that should be quite a few, not only here.

maybe Lapalingo already knows more than other oc? --> maybe from next year on, benefit recipients will be generally excluded from participating in oc? (which of course contradicts another principle).

fact is, by the exact data collection who what how much and where has paid in and out is every cent so everything exactly evident and this info will certainly be forwarded to appropriate bodies

it doesn't concern me, but what acceptable reason could there be as an oc for a few euros to demand proof of salary and thus to take on a targeted shitstorm with lots of voluntary acc closures? they hardly do something like that because they just want to harm themselves.
the answer and your assumptions interested me times

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg wrote on 28.10.2020 at 16:58
Well that's a good question. Especially since the administrative cost could soon be higher than the 29 euros. 😂

This post has been translated automatically

sippi wrote on 10/28/2020 at 5:47 pm
They're a governmental, executive body, so

This post has been translated automatically

Bone wrote on 28.10.2020 at 22:03: Only times briefly thrown in and then directly slid out again from the thread: It would be absolutely against the law to deny an unemployed person on benefits the right to participate in gambling

Believe rather it goes with Lapalingo around what else. What some here somehow forget is that according to mga statutes casinos are obliged to verify the source of income of players to ensure that the money does not come from illegal activities

Of course, this is complete nonsense with a €29 payout and a no Deposit bonus, but Lapalingo is simply making use of applicable law here. So all the excitement will bring nothing. Either write off the payout or just send in proof of salary. Where I also really do not understand what is so bad about it. I mean we all hand over sensitive data to the casinos and somehow rely on the fact that they will be safe and that everything is correct, because we have no other choice. If it is now so that you can no longer gamble without proof of salary is just another verification. I understand that you actually want to be in the right. But you can't win that fight either. So RebelYell, just send them a proof and that's it. Nothing can happen.

This post has been translated automatically