Cashi Mashi: [solved] Cashimashi payout over 7000€ (Page 4)

Falko wrote on 31.08.2020 at 20:33
Above all extremely painful for people who do not bathe in money. It's like when you lose your wallet with 750 euros in it and it can never be found again And the sum at TE is still much higher. Would like to know how much money the casino has already denied through these bonus violations in payouts in total.

This post has been translated automatically

Kuno_Korken wrote on 02.09.2020 at 13:15
Um, anyone who doesn't bathe in money shouldn't gamble anyway
Apart from that he got his Deposit back after all - so nothing lost.
And in all likelihood the money will then remain in the casino anyway and gambled away - has already worked once "to come up".

Apart from that CashiMashi has revised their terms and conditions especially because of one of these cases.
Before, the point was much more unclear and clearly misunderstood.
Now they have updated the point and it clearly states there what is allowed and what is not.
But if you don't take the time to inform yourself properly you don't have to get upset nor shout out loud Blacklist BLACKLIST.

This post has been translated automatically

Kuno_Korken wrote on 02.09.2020 at 13:15
Um, anyone who doesn't bathe in money shouldn't gamble anyway
Apart from that he got his Deposit back after all - so nothing lost.
And in all likelihood the money will then remain in the casino anyway and gambled away - has already worked once "to come up".

Apart from that CashiMashi has revised their terms and conditions especially because of one of these cases.
Before, the point was much more unclear and clearly misunderstood.
Now they have updated the point and it clearly states there what is allowed and what is not.
But if you don't take the time to inform yourself properly you don't have to get upset nor shout out loud Blacklist BLACKLIST.

This post has been translated automatically

Kuno_Korken wrote on 02.09.2020 at 13:15
Um, anyone who doesn't bathe in money shouldn't gamble anyway
Apart from that he got his Deposit back after all - so nothing lost.
And in all likelihood the money will then remain in the casino anyway and gambled away - has already worked once "to come up".

Apart from that CashiMashi has revised their terms and conditions especially because of one of these cases.
Before, the point was much more unclear and clearly misunderstood.
Now they have updated the point and it clearly states there what is allowed and what is not.
But if you don't take the time to inform yourself properly you don't have to get upset nor shout out loud Blacklist BLACKLIST.

This post has been translated automatically

redfoxx wrote on 12/09/2020 at 04:46 PM
dID REVISED. EXTRA. and now everything is spiffy because before the point was unclear - no wait, what was your wording again - "before the point was much more unclear". Short question: how can something that is so modestly formulated (in terms of unambiguous interpretation) have been "even more unclear" before? You have to get that right first. Chapeau

And now the guys & gals of CashiMashi have really taken so much trouble to reformulate their self-botted text junk, which is also only moderately successful btw - since one should already scream HURRA HURRA CASINO and not BLACKLISTED. (by the way, it makes sense not to yell at your online conversation partners. that's really extremely unpleasant)

Anyway, I'm completely with you, I wanted to say: Great they did that - and in no way is the whole rule (including their 1st and also 2nd version) a deliberately placed trap in the hope to maximize their own profit by not paying out the win of their customers.
It is also more than fair to give the TE his Deposit back - let him be happy! Where the good-for-nothing puts everything back into the machines anyway, this is a sign of great foresight and forbearance on the part of the casino. So gratitude would be appropriate

Yo

Cashimashi pulls there really ne awesome number through - but you have with your post here just shot the bird. All respect.

This post has been translated automatically

redfoxx wrote on 12/09/2020 at 04:46 PM
dID REVISED. EXTRA. and now everything is spiffy because before the point was unclear - no wait, what was your wording again - "before the point was much more unclear". Short question: how can something that is so modestly formulated (in terms of unambiguous interpretation) have been "even more unclear" before? You have to get that right first. Chapeau

And now the guys & gals of CashiMashi have really taken so much trouble to reformulate their self-botted text junk, which is also only moderately successful btw - since one should already scream HURRA HURRA CASINO and not BLACKLISTED. (by the way, it makes sense not to yell at your online conversation partners. that's really extremely unpleasant)

Anyway, I'm completely with you, I wanted to say: Great they did that - and in no way is the whole rule (including their 1st and also 2nd version) a deliberately placed trap in the hope to maximize their own profit by not paying out the win of their customers.
It is also more than fair to give the TE his Deposit back - let him be happy! Where the good-for-nothing puts everything back into the machines anyway, this is a sign of great foresight and forbearance on the part of the casino. So gratitude would be appropriate

Yo

Cashimashi pulls there really ne awesome number through - but you have with your post here just shot the bird. All respect.

This post has been translated automatically

Kuno_Korken wrote on 12.09.2020 at 15:05
Even before that the point was to understand and if you don't understand it, then you ask and hedge?
But of course it is definitely easier to always blame the other person.
Ignorance does not protect against punishment - you do not need to write half a novel.
The AGB's are accepted with the registration - finished.
Is also not so that it can not still play enough other casinos, if one does not like a AGB Passus.
I don't have to tell you about the possibility of simply playing without a bonus if you don't feel like reading the terms and conditions.

This post has been translated automatically

derzweifel wrote on 12.09.2020 at 16:13
Can only shake your head that you continuously defend this rip-off here. Tell your employer they should start behaving like a reputable casino operator.

This post has been translated automatically